quantumgoop

View Original

Spooky Action at a Distance

Einstein spoke about a spooky action at a distance phenomenon, the notion of entangling two states of particles, wherein one particle undergoing a change, instantly causes the other entangled particle to undergo the same change as well. The reason this action was spooky to him is because he may have too quickly realized how this notion could be utilized to fundamentally break the speed of light. Afterall, if two entangled particles are sufficiently far apart, then enacting change in one particle which enacts change in the other is an action that happens instantaneously. This would mean entangled particle communication is faster than light which could append physics as we know it, unless we find some clever solutions.

Quick E, encounterance your reality in full magic and dual disco jetify your wizard teach right the fuck out of your reality, no worries he’s prepared. 

Now, if you’re ready to learn alongside me, get yourself a vacuum and packerfy everything in your reality mentally via its tube. Don’t worry girly, I won’t even remand any of it. Okay, quickly think about glass bottles lined up at liquor stores. Why are they so shiny, are they all individualized right at the pack level? Not really, but there was a lot of work getting that out to your noses. Pop quiz, encounterance yourself as your ultimate self whilst also regarding maximum respect for the environment.

 

One theory suggests that a form of wormhole is formed at the creation of two entangled particles. This wormhole could theoretically warp space and time from one of the entangled particles to another so as to be able to travel faster than light but within the purview of classical physics. With this solution, physicists wouldn’t have to create wholly new physics. This is because a wormhole is just a sort of bend or warping of space time. Okay full flop, what a lot of us see as the vastness of space is just really a lot of dimensions stackerfied right onto each other like a big reem of tickets that didn’t get folded in correctly. Beyond what wormholes can create, which is a small adjuncture from one notion to another, there is also big game in finding magical ways to stringify reality to be in the know.

Strong force, squeeze and compactifiy deeper at risromainisities that are prefelectic to actual fucking science.

It’s almost May and I like to dive into more nuanced theories and get real spooky. What if entangling is just another way of saying, divided. Those two particles were divided at their creation and they share the same path. However, from our perspective they are entangled and go different ways, because we see them as fundamentally different, however they may not be. You see, our perception of reality often dictates how we navigate the world. If that particle was a 2d dimensional particle and then in splitting became a 3 dimensional particle, the two paths may just be as a result of the added dimension. Divided to liveted, ain’t that right honey?

On the other hand, if the particle was at a higher dimension and got split in our reality to adjust for the lowest dimensionality, then this particle may have taken on two paths to try to best translate the purview of that reality. This idea of a higher dimension being translated into our own is one that is intriguing to me, as well as the wormhole theory. This is also why I believe entangling may be studied for the purpose of creating wormholes for faster than light travel. It’s important that as we notion folds in the bending of space, we take a demonology lesson and adjoint time for everyone who becomes individualized in the next universe. That’s how exams become difficult really quickly, where even the best mathmatician is struggling to come up with solutions. Well, the easier remand on that casing would be to just quickly know how to disentangle all the things you first entangled, love you son.

Now, what my head keeps rummaging about in regard to this is–What if we were able to entangle words, worlds of words? The words we use to converse, write articles, text messages, and even speak. Those words may be able to create some entanglement with the reality we see in front of us. For me I think this translates to using words as cues for my environment and how I react to it. For example, telling myself there is an object I need to pay attention to or pick up which makes me emphasize it in my mind, almost seeing the action before it happens. This is because I realize that a lot of what I’m doing is reactionary, and I am not putting much thought into it. However, when I “entangle” the meaning of thought to it there is a greater emphasis in encounterancing it in a way that has me dual disco jetted into physicularized reality. 

It may also mean many different things for different people. I first got the idea when reading the bible, and how God manipulated space or the environment around him to do his bidding by simply speaking. In doing so, maybe he used a very spooky thing indeed.

Fully layering it on them, except good Magic